Through the Kennebec, over the Bigelows, on to Stratton we shall go!

It’s been 70 miles since we last surfaced. Our guidebook tells us that we’ve crossed the 2000 to-go line…only 1997.7 miles to Springer Mountain!


Our first day out of Monson was fairly uneventful. Our goal was to make it past both fords of the Piscataquis River before it started raining. We succeeded and setup camp just past the second ford.

We awoke to a steady rain which would continue at varying levels of intensity for the rest of the day. Waking up to the sound of raindrops hitting the nylon of a tent’s rainfly is uninspiring to say the least. Our decision was to pack up as quickly as possible and hit the trail. What we actually ended up doing was starting late and sloshing through the stream of a trail for four and a half hours before giving up for the day at the first shelter after walking less then six miles. Oh well, it turned out to be a lovely place to spend the night…

Day 3 brought the return of the sun on our climb up Moxie Bald…


…which is a very pretty place…


…full of very cool trail features…


And then we started up Pleasant Pond Mountain, but setup camp early to outfox some late afternoon thunderstorms which ultimately missed us. Better safe than sorry… After two days of low mileage, we decided to wake up at 4:00am the next morning in an attempt to makeup for lost time.


We were rewarded for our early-birdedness (not a real word) when we hiked into Caratunk (population 69) in the early afternoon. We had the great fortune of being picked up by the owner of the Sterling Inn and spending a few hours in his dining room gorging ourselves on frozen pizza and soda. We stocked up on candy, said our thank yous and headed for the Kennebec…


…which we forded by canoe (as per the official AT route)


And then we saw a bunch of snakes…


And crossed a cool bridge…


And hiked through some beautiful terrain…






And then the Bigelows. Simply stunning:











An now we’re off! See you soon!

6 thoughts on “Through the Kennebec, over the Bigelows, on to Stratton we shall go!

  1. Learn how to write an assessment literature.
    Подробнее читайте здесь – официальный сайт
    What is an assessment of literature?
    Writing the introduction
    Writing our bodies
    Writing the actual final outcome
    What is evaluation literature?
    The format of an assessment literature are different from discipline to
    discipline and from assignment to assignment.

    A review is often a self-contained unit — a conclusion in itself —
    or maybe a preface to and rationale for doing primary research.
    A review is usually a required portion of
    grant and research proposals and infrequently a chapter in theses
    and dissertations.

    Generally, the purpose of the review would be
    to analyze critically a segment of an published
    body expertise through summary, classification, and
    comparison of prior clinical tests, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.

    Writing the introduction
    In the introduction, you need to:

    Define or identify the final topic, issue, or part of concern, thus providing the ideal context for reviewing the literature.

    Point out overall trends of what has been published about the subject; or conflicts on paper,
    methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or perhaps a single problem or new perspective
    of immediate interest.
    Establish the writer’s reason (mindset) for reviewing the literature; explain the
    factors to be used in analyzing and comparing literature as well as the organization from the review (sequence);
    and, when needed, state why certain literature is or possibly not included (scope).


    Writing one’s body
    In our bodies, you ought to:

    Group studies and other sorts of literature (reviews,
    theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) as outlined by common denominators including qualitative
    versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors,
    specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.
    Summarize individual studies or articles with all the or very little detail as each merits in line with its comparative importance inside the literature, remembering that
    space (length) denotes significance.
    Provide the various readers with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout,
    and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points from the review to help in understanding comparisons and analyses.

    Writing concluding
    In in conclusion, you must:

    Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles for the body of
    information under review, maintaining the main objective established from the introduction.
    Evaluate the actual “state with the art” with the body of info reviewed,
    stating major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies
    in principle and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study.

    Conclude through providing some understanding of the relationship relating to
    the central topic from the literature review plus a larger division of
    study like a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or maybe
    a profession.

    For more information see our handouts on Writing a Critical Review of an Nonfiction Book or Article or Reading a Book to Review It.

    To read more about literature reviews, consider our workshop on Writing
    Literature Reviews of Published Research.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s